Showing posts sorted by relevance for query Fudgin. Sort by date Show all posts
Showing posts sorted by relevance for query Fudgin. Sort by date Show all posts

Monday, February 27, 2012

Frackin', Fudgin', Freakin', In-"F"-able[!]

Frackin'
Fudgin'
Freakin'
In-F-Able! -

Mitt,
Newt,
Ron,
Rick.

Not exactly a cross word, ribble or ineffable...
But by George, close enough for G work.

http://political_progress_for_people.blogspot.com/search?q=close+enough+for

http://thinkprogress.org/politics/2010/04/24/93492/steve-king-repeal-uncertainty/

[Speaking of ineffable...($F=G works) see previous post, Re:mouse and image/edit problems, not to 4close the word or scroll, over.]
[Please note that an anamoly has been cured. Which I hope to mention later...or knot[!]]

http://political_progress_for_people.blogspot.com/2012/02/saint-or-um.html

http://www.facebook.com/permalink.php?story_fbid=311251275598904&id=100000176362685#!/permalink.php?story_fbid=371162076234764&id=100000176362685

Tuesday, August 07, 2012

Snooze Alarm

Something about Romney and...
(T M I)

These are not actually the stuff of dreams or my AM snoozing, but if President Obama were half as frightening as the right would have him, the left and the middle would be more content.***

[Not Exactly]

Dirty Harry and Fake My Day:  Rachel Maddow nails Romney on lastest ad that*...

...can't be put into words.   Maybe** a Mitt Sand Witch or Which.  Well... three words.  Frackin', fudgin', in-F-able!  Or goose the gander.  I will hold off on the links for now.  One word is waver, or "cul de sac" of politics.  Another is "running".  For what?(Or from...)  Romney wavers on wavers and shoots Romneyfair or care in the foot.  How high is the cow pie?  Or maybe the real word is "works". The right implication is that Romney and the Federal Government would dictate what works.  Could he trickle down any philosophy more?  The pour won per cent[!]

* link and continued sentence 8-8-12
**image/cartoons

***

Wednesday, February 01, 2012

Child's Play

Freak Show vs. Bogeyman:

While my original intent was the feeling that this is getting old, or rather childish. Then to see the nature of the exchange on Morning Joe, it takes some perspectivising.* Martin Bashir covers another aspect of the picture show. Back to the future, I mean Morning Joe, who is in the drivers seat? Mika or Joe? The image of President Obama getting into a car at an auto show. Who is in the drivers seat? Politically the President is. But it is like one of those drivers-ed cars with a second wheel and brakes on the passenger side, and congress is in that seat. But with Batman, I mean Bashir on West, Republicans would have no message if they did not have imagined monsters: "equality of achievement", "economic dependency"and "enslaving".

So...bottom line, Political is a double-edged sword. There is the race and there is the economy. Congress plays a role in both, and negative is not just ugly, it can have actual facts. So Mika can say that Obama is behind the wheel. And Joe can say he is not. Now you may see that the president is not the only one in the car, with a hand on the wheel.

* not that I take the Mediaite perspective (Donny Deutsch made a reasonable point, see negative/ugly/facts.)



[Not to call it a hatefest, just a hecuvafest.]
[Not to rob Peter to pay Paul. See Freudian/Austrian. Lit-urgeical hint]
[Couched Analogy?]
[not to leap fest** but I am missing a piece on certainty***.]
[Action item: FEC apointments & expired terms]

** tba: no pun on SBA, but to be arranged
*** dba? a pun/myst on the "free market" need(see drives-ed car) for certainty
[BTW: if you need GPS, why not Ctrl F frackin' fudgin"? Pun with acronyms, not to mention initialism. Speaking of caricatures and labelism.]

Wednesday, May 01, 2013

MAY 2013 FOOTNOTE PAGE ONE

5-1-13 Happy May Day!: Bad Footnote Day. If you can scroll over while reading you MIGHT have a better shot at my gist [!] [Poetic Justice, Justice? (s.c. ), Technical Difficulties!Pass the Trillion.[FP2]
Note: (s.c.) = scroll click flip-flop resulting from blog search algorithm(May B?)
Brook No Truck ?[!] : I think I have been clear enough but here are blog searched(b.s.) references under 'twain.[(A, B, c, d, E, f, G, H, I, J, K, L, M(m), N(n), O(o), P(p), Q (q).]

5-6-13: Having read the Non-Sense links, there seems intentional wiggle room. Ctrl F "telegraph+blows":  Rebublican Obstruction? / GOLEFT TV (sc), Rope a dope. (sc), BIG TENT v. MESS TENT, FAST REVERSE or BACKTRACK BEFORE FAST TRACK.

5-7-13: (b.s.) Fear and RunningOut Foxed?, Who Are They Calling Elitist?, Is Tea Party Beck?
[(b.s.)  THE COUNCIL OF NICE(s.c.), DOEE (Dept. of Everything Else)(s.c.), (c), Fearnauts(s.c.), The Mess Age is the Message!(s.c.).] [[(b.s.USE THE PROCESS OR LOSE IT*.( s.c. ), Try Lemmings , Kidding Goats ?]] *

5-8-13: David Sirota's piece is the focus of the caution or heading.

5-10-13 (Spoiler alert under Penzance here.). Spinning off on the ad-HOC Chair.  The Issa's committee hearings seem purely partisan politics and a mockery of checks and balances and any comparison to Watergate, except from a parodical hysterical perspective: the modern inquisitional.   [Not to Al Gore Rythm.]

5-15-13: Not too Mitt Flop [!].  Journalists fume over DOJ raid on AP, Stewart Slams Obama Again: You Can’t Keep Saying You Found Out About News At The Same Time As Us!,  Connecting the Cheese Heads. Hint: hyperlinks Too Fudgin' Ridiculous & (s.c.)(b.s.)

5-17-13: another a maizing field trip ?!

5-29-13: move from to read ( ?/10 [!]) [11?]

5-30-13:  (hard work)= Ambivalence on Syria? ,  (without going)= Transparent Reactionaries ,  (heading or mangling )  "Hotheads" and Frank on Banks :  Par don e moi ?

Tuesday, January 01, 2013

(fn)FOR D...

JAN 2012 FOOTNOTE PAGE FOUR

1-3-13 The time and comment escapes me, not to mention* clogs**.
*Ironically(and indubitably) Perry is Right! (Scroll Click)
ROF, WOF
**SC(scroll click)(done)
(part two)
not4knot ornaught...
Budget Bandits?
DECEMBER 2012 FOOTNOTES (fn) PAGE (INCOMPLETE)
Clear Eyes,
Ghost of X-mas Passed.
A Triangle
First Sources $what does that mean?$
Frackin', Fudgin', Freakin', In-"F"-able[!] (sc) or that?
Long Story (D-algorithm?)scroll over
Work is a four letter word. (ouch)
Everything on the table? (that's what I'm $alking about?)
Who's counting?
Emergency (Iraq) Supplemental Passes Senate: 51-47 (SC?)
One man, one vote for knot?
i.e. S.E. (vi) edgy
$not to cut it too corny or wonky, in terms of (fn) 5th Sense, but there is something fishy with the headings and scroll overs as I roll out the (b.s.) for "knot".  Was it a my plan or the in-"F"-able that the 4F were anomolies not to mention the Supplemental?